Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ganganally Mallappa Basavaraju Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ganganally Mallappa Basavaraju Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) The ITAT Bangalore adopted a balanced approach—condoning delay with penalty while restoring the matter for fresh adjudication, emphasizing natural justice but not sparing negligent conduct. The assessee’s case was reopened and a huge addition of ₹2.40 crore was made due to mismatch in income and non-response to notices. Even before CIT(A), the appeal was filed with 222 days delay and was dismissed in limine without merit adjudication. Before the Tribunal, the assessee cited medical reasons for non-appearance. The ITAT noted that whil...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delhi ITAT Upholds PF/ESI Disallowance in U/s 143(1) Processing; Income-tax Act, 2025 Relief Held Prospective Wrong Section Used to Deny Depreciation Set-Off; Section 263 Order Quashed Municipal Body’s Section 10(20) Exemption Cannot Be Denied Due to Wrong Claim in Return No Addition on a Different Issue if Reopened Issue Fails: ITAT Deletes ₹5.75 Crore Disallowance Retracted Statement Alone Cannot Justify Section 68 Addition: ITAT Deletes Accommodation Loan Additions View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930