This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No Specific Charge = No Penalty – ITAT Deletes 270A Penalty for Vague Notice Bonafide Claim
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Mustafa Alihusain Sunelwala Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2022-23
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Mustafa Alihusain Sunelwala Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
No Specific Charge = No Penalty – ITAT Deletes 270A Penalty for Vague Notice Bonafide Claim
In Mustafa Alihusain Sunelwala vs ITO, the Pune ITAT deleted penalty u/s 270A, holding that absence of a clear charge and existence of a bona fide claim defeats penalty for “misreporting”.
The assessee’s return was subjected to scrutiny where deductions for cost of improvement and exemption u/s 54F were disallowed due to lack of evidence and ineligibility. The AO completed assessment ex-parte and levied penalty of ₹15.48 lakh u/s 270A, treating th...





