Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nitin Bhatia Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nitin Bhatia Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Section 54 Deduction Allowed Despite CGAS Non-Deposit Due to Timely Property Investment; Capital Gains Exemption Granted Because Section 54(2) Held Procedural, Not Mandatory; Full Section 54 Relief Allowed Since New House Was Purchased Within Two Years; Deduction Under Section 54 Restored as Actual Investment Trumped CGAS Technicality; Section 54 Claim Upheld Because Substantive Compliance Overrides Procedural Lapse The Hyderabad Bench of the ITAT held that deduction under Section 54 cannot be denied merely for non-deposit of unutilised capital gains in th...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Experienced professional with over 3 years of Post qualification experience in handling Assessments, dealing CIT(A) and ITAT Appeals. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Central Circle Not Exempt from Faceless Reassessment Regime: ITAT Hyderabad Appeal Dismissal for Non-Prosecution Invalid When Notices Sent to Wrong Email Address Telangana HC Quashes Section 148 Unsigned Reassessment Notice ITAT Hyderabad Dropped Penalties When Compliance Made Before Assessment Ends ₹3.49 Cr Cash Seizure Backed by Cash Book & Debtor Realisations: ITAT Deletes Sec 69A Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930