Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tahir Khan Vs ITO (ITAT Agra)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Tahir Khan Vs ITO (ITAT Agra) Penalty of ₹83.45 Lakh u/s 271(1)(c) Quashed for Defective Notice; Failure to Specify Charge Vitiates Proceedings – ITAT Agra The Agra Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal and deleted penalty of ₹83.45 lakh levied under section 271(1)(c) for AY 2014-15, holding that the entire penalty proceedings were void ab initio due to a defective and vague show-cause notice. The Assessing Officer had imposed penalty pursuant to large additions (mainly ₹97.31 lakh under section 56(2)(vii) and other ad-hoc disallowances). The assessee challenged the penalty...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bangalore ITAT Upholds Section 11 Exemption Despite Alleged Capitation Fee Collections Bangalore ITAT Allows Mine Development Expenditure as Revenue Expense; Deletes Double Addition ITAT Allows Exemption for BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition; Cash Redeposit from Earlier Property Sale Accepted Entire Sales Receipts Cannot Be Taxed Under Section 69A: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930