Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : RishirajHitendra Bhandari Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
RishirajHitendra Bhandari Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The Mumbai ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2017-18 and deleted the penalty levied under section 271AAC, holding that the penalty was purely consequential to the addition made under section 69 of the Income-tax Act. In the quantum proceedings, the CIT(A) had entirely deleted the adition under section 69 relating to alleged unexplained investment in an immovable property (which was primarily in the name of the assessee’s father, with the assessee as a joint owner). The Revenue did not challenge this quantum relief. The Tribunal observe...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930