Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Utkarsh Balaso Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Utkarsh Balaso Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Substance Over Penalty: 234E Fee Not Sustainable for Returns Processed Before 01.06.2015 Background Appeals: 14 appeals covering quarters of FYs 2013-14 & 2014-15 (Forms 24Q/26Q). Dispute: Levy of late fee u/s 234E for delayed filing of TDS statements. CPC: While processing returns u/s 200A, levied late fee u/s 234E. CIT(A)/NFAC (10.06.2025): Dismissed appeals, confirmed levy. Assessee’s Arguments Fee u/s 234E not applicable prior to 01.06.2015, since enabling provision in sec. 200A(c) inserted prospectively by Finance Act, 2015. Relied on multi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Mention of Section 69 Instead of 69A Does Not Invalidate Addition: ITAT Hyderabad Gift from Mother Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Investment: ITAT Hyderabad Temporary Cash Support for Student Visa Is Not a Loan Under Section 269SS: ITAT Chennai Section 69A Cannot Be Invoked for Cash Withdrawals from Own Bank Account Income Declared in Original Return Cannot Be Reduced in Section 148 Return: ITAT Hyderabad View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031