This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 158BE – A panchnama which does not record a search does not extend limitation
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ACIT vs. Shree Ram Lime Products Ltd (ITAT Jodhpur)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 1997-98 to 2003-04
- Courts
- ITAT Jodhpur
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Shree Ram Lime Products Ltd (ITAT Jodhpur Special Bench)
Reckoning point to compute the time limit will be drawing of last panchnama in respect of any authorization issued in a particular case. However, it has already been held that the “last panchnama” as relevant for Explanation 2 to section 158BE will be the panchnama which show the conclusion of the search. Panchnama dated 3rd January, 2003 in the present case has not recorded the conclusion of search, but, it was a mere formality to revoke prohibitory order passed on 21st D...
