Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Sunil Giridhar Raheja HUF (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Sunil Giridhar Raheja HUF (ITAT Mumbai) AO made addition of ₹50 lakh u/s 68 treating loans from alleged entry operators (Sampada Chemicals Ltd. & P. Saji Textiles Ltd.) as accommodation entries based on Investigation Wing report. CIT(A) deleted the addition. ITAT held: AO relied only on third-party information: No independent verification of bank statements or transactions Addition partly beyond scope of reopening: Reasons recorded were only for one party, but addition made for two CIT(A) also erred: Deleted addition without conducting proper verification Both authorities faile...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

80P Relief Largely Allowed – Interest on Investments Held Eligible, Staff Loan Interest Taxable Nominal Members No Bar for 80P Deduction—ITAT Allows Relief & SBI Interest Expense Set-off Late Form 10B Filing Not Fatal—ITAT Allows Exemption if Audit Report Filed Before Processing Wrong Invocation of Section 153C- ITAT Quashes Assessments Where Assessee Was Himself Searched ITAT Limits Its Directions – Excludes Comparables Due to Improper Remand to DRP View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930