Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Sunil Giridhar Raheja HUF (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Sunil Giridhar Raheja HUF (ITAT Mumbai) AO made addition of ₹50 lakh u/s 68 treating loans from alleged entry operators (Sampada Chemicals Ltd. & P. Saji Textiles Ltd.) as accommodation entries based on Investigation Wing report. CIT(A) deleted the addition. ITAT held: AO relied only on third-party information: No independent verification of bank statements or transactions Addition partly beyond scope of reopening: Reasons recorded were only for one party, but addition made for two CIT(A) also erred: Deleted addition without conducting proper verification Both authorities faile...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Benami Veil Cannot Be Lifted by Clever Drafting: SC Restores Rejection of Plaint at Threshold Specific Performance Decree Does Not Die Automatically: SC Revives Execution Despite Delay in Deposit IBC Is Not a Recovery Shortcut: SC Rejects CIRP in Builder-Bank-Borrower Dispute No Signature, Yet Bound by Arbitration: SC Allows Collaborator to Invoke Arbitration Clause Entire Bank Deposits Cannot Be Taxed as Income – ITAT Restricts Addition to 2% in Renukamata Society Cases View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031