Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Sunil Giridhar Raheja HUF (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Sunil Giridhar Raheja HUF (ITAT Mumbai) AO made addition of ₹50 lakh u/s 68 treating loans from alleged entry operators (Sampada Chemicals Ltd. & P. Saji Textiles Ltd.) as accommodation entries based on Investigation Wing report. CIT(A) deleted the addition. ITAT held: AO relied only on third-party information: No independent verification of bank statements or transactions Addition partly beyond scope of reopening: Reasons recorded were only for one party, but addition made for two CIT(A) also erred: Deleted addition without conducting proper verification Both authorities faile...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

‘Make Available’ Test Not Met, No TDS on US Software Contractor Payments: ITAT Bangalore Section 54 Exemption Available for Every House Sold: Bengaluru ITAT Books Can’t Be Rejected Solely for Non-Audit; 8% Profit Estimate Quashed Apartment Owners’ Association Not Taxable at Maximum Marginal Rate: ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Allowed Section 80P Deduction on Interest from Scheduled & Co-op Banks View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031