Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suresh Kumar Giddaluru Vs Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suresh Kumar Giddaluru Vs Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (ITAT Surat) Reassessment Quashed for Invalid Sanction: Approval by PCIT Instead of Competent Authority Renders Notice Void The Surat Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2018-19 by quashing the reassessment proceedings on a pure jurisdictional defect. The Tribunal held that since the notice under section 148 was issued on 05.04.2022—after expiry of three years from the end of the relevant assessment year—the mandatory sanction under section 151 was required to be granted by the Principal Chief Commissioner/Chie...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Benami Veil Cannot Be Lifted by Clever Drafting: SC Restores Rejection of Plaint at Threshold Specific Performance Decree Does Not Die Automatically: SC Revives Execution Despite Delay in Deposit IBC Is Not a Recovery Shortcut: SC Rejects CIRP in Builder-Bank-Borrower Dispute No Signature, Yet Bound by Arbitration: SC Allows Collaborator to Invoke Arbitration Clause Entire Bank Deposits Cannot Be Taxed as Income – ITAT Restricts Addition to 2% in Renukamata Society Cases View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031