Case Law Details
Case Name : Parasuraman Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Courts :
ITAT Chennai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Parasuraman Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
ITAT Chennai deletes penalty u/s 271B – commission agent not liable for audit when only earning commission income
Assessee, an individual from Cuddalore, filed his return for AY 2022-23 declaring income of ₹ 5,04,770 from commission business. He acted as an agent collecting stamp-duty payments from the public & remitting them to the Tamil Nadu Registration Department, earning a small commission thereon. During scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144B, the AO accepted the Assessee’s explanation for cash deposits &
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


