Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vishnukumar Gokalchand Gupta Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vishnukumar Gokalchand Gupta Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai Remands Case – Fresh Verification Ordered on Cost of Improvement in Capital Gains Assessee sold a property for ₹7.93 crore in FY 2015-16. While computing long-term capital gains, he claimed ₹1.41 crore as indexed cost of improvement – comprising ₹36.52 lakh spent by him on the first floor & ₹1.04 crore incurred by his brother on the second floor before gifting that portion to Assessee. AO rejected the claim holding that the bungalow purchased in 1988 was already a completed house & that no evidence was produ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Patna ITAT: Interest on Delayed Payment of Sales Tax, Service Tax & Employer’s PF Contribution Allowable; TDS Interest Not Deductible Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031