Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Penalty Quashed for Non-Existent Undisclosed Income under Section 271AAB

Case Law Details

Case Name
Raja Ram Maheshwari Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2014-15
Advertisement Raja Ram Maheshwari Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur) The appeal concerns the levy of penalty under Section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2014-15 following a search conducted under Section 132. The assessee, engaged in the business of manufacturing gold ornaments and jewellery, belongs to the SNG Group. A search and seizure operation was carried out on the assessee’s business and residential premises on 26.02.2014. Subsequently, the assessee filed his income tax return on 22.11.2014 declaring total income of ₹2,59,39,510, including ₹2,58,56,654 disclosed as ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,551

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *