Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

MoU Does Not Trigger Capital Gains Tax; Year of Registered Sale Deed is Relevant

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 7016
Case Name
Tushar Enterprises Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2011-12
Advertisement


Tushar Enterprises Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

Facts- Tushar Enterprises purchased Gala No. 4, Ground Floor, Satyam Industrial Estate, Jogeshwari (East), Mumbai on 09.08.1995 for ₹12 lakh and entered into a Memorandum of Understanding on 05.02.2004 to sell it to Mr. Prakash Bhagwan Canser for ₹12.51 lakh, receiving ₹3 lakh on 03.01.2004 and agreeing to hand over possession on 31.03.2004.

At the time of the MoU, the property was mortgaged to Bank of Maharashtra as collateral for credit facilities of another company, with the MoU stipulating that the lien would be cleared before executing the sale deed.

The lien was released by the bank only on 26.10.2010, and a registered sale deed was executed on 09.12.2010, with the remaining consideration (more than 50% of the total) paid in FY 2010-11.

On receiving information that the property was sold below market value and no return was filed, the Assessing Officer issued notice under section 148 on 08.03.2016 and initiated reassessment under section 147; the assessee contended that the transfer occurred in AY 2004-05.

As the sale consideration was lower than the stamp duty value, the AO invoked section 50C and referred the matter to the DVO, who valued the property at ₹20,57,000 as on 05.02.2004.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

Adv (CA) Vijay Gupta
Qualification: LL.B / Advocate
Company: KRV Associates
Location: Delhi, Delhi
Articles Published: 131

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.