Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Mercator Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No.7607/Mum/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/08/2024
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

DCIT Vs Mercator Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)

In the case of DCIT vs. Mercator Ltd, the ITAT Mumbai addressed appeals for assessment years 2008-09 to 2014-15 amid the company’s liquidation under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. Mercator Ltd, which had been ordered into liquidation by the NCLT on February 21, 2023, was found to be under moratorium, which prevents new legal proceedings against the corporate debtor. The tribunal emphasized that during this moratorium, including the income tax proceedings, no suits or legal actions can be initiated except by the liquidator with prior approval. Consequently, the ITAT dismissed the appeals in limine, allowing the parties the option to revisit the appeal after the liquidation process, should the liquidator or committee of creditors permit it. The decision reinforces the IBC’s protection against legal actions during liquidation, ensuring that proceedings are handled by the appointed liquidator.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT MUMBAI

These are the cross appeals filed by the erstwhile company and the department for various assessment years starting from A.Y.2008-09 to 2014-15.

2. It has been brought on record that this company has gone into liquidation and proceedings u/s.7 of IBC Code, 2016 has been initiated. The NCLT vide its order dated 21/02/2023 had approved the corporate debtor company into liquidation as a going concern as per IBC code and also has appointed liquidator, Mr. Girish S Juneja. Following order has been passed:-

The above I.A. No. 959 of 2022 is allowed and the Corporate Debtor, Mercator Limited is ordered to be liquidated as a going concern.

a. Girish S. Juneja (Regn No: IPA-001/IP-P00999/ 2017­2018/11646) and having office at 22 Dignity Apartments, Bon Lane, 7 Bungalows, Versova, Andheri (W) Mumbai: 400 053 is hereby appointed as the Liquidator as provided under Section 34(1) of the Code.

b. That the Liquidator for conduct of the liquidation proceedings would be entitled to the fees as provided in Regulation 4(2)(b) of the IBBI (Liquidation Process Regulations), 2016.

c. The Liquidator appointed in this case to initiate liquidation process as envisaged under Chapter-III of the Code by following the liquidation process given in the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016.

d. The Liquidator appointed under section 34(1) of the Code will have all powers of the board of directors, key managerial personnel and the partners of the Corporate Debtor, as the case may be, shall cease to have effect and shall be vested with the liquidator.

e. That the Corporate Debtor to be liquidated in the manner as laid down in the Chapter by issuing Public Notice stating that the Corporate Debtor is in liquidation with a direction to the Liquidator to send this order to the ROC under which this Company has been registered.

f. All the powers of the Board of Directors, Key Managerial Persons, the Partners of the Corporate Debtor hereafter ceased to exist. All these powers henceforth vest with the Liquidator.

g. That the personnel of the Corporate Debtor are directed to extend all co-operation to the Liquidator as required by him in managing the liquidation process of the Corporate Debtor.

h. That on having liquidation process initiated, subject to Section 52 of the Code, no suit or other legal proceeding shall be instituted by or against the Corporate Debtor save and except the liberty to the liquidator to institute suit or other legal proceeding on behalf of the Corporate Debtor with prior approval of this Adjudicating Authority.

i. This liquidation order shall be deemed to be a notice of discharge to the officers, employees and workmen of the Corporate Debtor except to the extent of the business of the Corporate Debtor continued during the liquidation process by the Liquidator.

j. The Registry is directed to communicate this order to the Liquidator

3. Once the liquidation process has been initiated then, subject to Section 52 of the IBC, no suit or other legal proceedings shall be instituted or against the corporate debtor save and except the liberty of the liquidator. Since there is a bar for initiating any suit or any other legal proceedings during moratorium, it also includes the income tax proceedings. Therefore, under these circumstances, it is premature to decide these appeals on merits. Accordingly, all these appeals are consigned to records and the parties shall be at liberty to restitute the appeal, once the committee of creditors or NCLT directs the Liquidator or corporate creditors (including Income Tax department) to pursue the appeal; or the liquidator after completion of process may approach to get the appeal disposed after filing revised Form 36. Accordingly, all the appeals are dismissed in limine, subject to above liberty given to the parties.

4. In the result, all the appeals are dismissed in limine.

Order pronounced on 5th August, 2024.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031