Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Genius Money Changer Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Genius Money Changer Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Late Return Filed after Sec 142(1) Notice Held Invalid; No 143(2) Notice Required When Return is Invalid; ITAT Restores Sec 69A Addition to AO The Tribunal ruled that a belated return filed beyond the statutory timeline in response to Section 142(1) is invalid, justifying best judgment assessment under Section 144. ITAT clarified that when a return filed is invalid under law, there is no requirement for notice under Section 143(2). The best judgment assessment under Section 144 was upheld, while addition of ₹52.34 under Section 69A was sent back to A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031