Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mtitanium Apartments Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2024-25
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mtitanium Apartments Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Tribunal rules that Mtitanium Apartments cannot claim ₹1.10 crore brought forward business losses as the income tax return for AY 2023-24 was filed late, despite medical hardship. ITAT Mumbai confirms that medical exigencies cannot override statutory deadlines under section 139(1) for claiming carry forward of business losses. Facts Mtitanium Apartments Pvt. Ltd., a domestic private limited company, filed its return of income for AY 2023-24 belatedly by 10 days, on 10.11.2023, instead of the due date 31.10.2023. The delay was attributed ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

I am Delhi Delhi-based advocate specializing in tax litigation and advisory, especially to corporates. I represent taxpayers at all tax tribunals and High Courts. we also undertake advisory in Mergers and Acquisitions matters. My contact details are vgrmc2018@gmail.com. 9811728992. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Delhi Deletes Bogus Purchase Addition as Sales Were Recorded ITAT Quashes Section 143(1) Adjustment as No Prior Notice Issued CIT(A) cannot enhance income on issues not examined by AO: ITAT Mumbai ITAT Deletes TP Addition as Nokia Shutdown Led to Distress Sale of Finished Goods ITAT Remands Case as CIT(A) Ignored Survey Findings on Accommodation Entries View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930