Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mtitanium Apartments Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2024-25
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mtitanium Apartments Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Tribunal rules that Mtitanium Apartments cannot claim ₹1.10 crore brought forward business losses as the income tax return for AY 2023-24 was filed late, despite medical hardship. ITAT Mumbai confirms that medical exigencies cannot override statutory deadlines under section 139(1) for claiming carry forward of business losses. Facts Mtitanium Apartments Pvt. Ltd., a domestic private limited company, filed its return of income for AY 2023-24 belatedly by 10 days, on 10.11.2023, instead of the due date 31.10.2023. The delay was attributed ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

I am Delhi Delhi-based advocate specializing in tax litigation and advisory, especially to corporates. I represent taxpayers at all tax tribunals and High Courts. we also undertake advisory in Mergers and Acquisitions matters. My contact details are vgrmc2018@gmail.com. 9811728992. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Agricultural Land Taxable as Capital Asset as It Fell Within Statutory Distance from Municipality APA Refund Reduces Taxable Royalty, No PE in India: Bombay HC ITAT Criticises AO’s Inaction as Remand Reports & Upholds Section 54 Denial Fantasy Sports Liable to GST as Skill Element Does Not Remove Uncertainty in Outcome: SC ALP Cannot Be Determined at Nil Without Comparable Analysis: ITAT Ahmedabad View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031