Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd  Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd  Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Advertisement & Promotion is Revenue Spend: ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹2.44 Cr Addition –  No Asset Creation, No Capitalisation: Tribunal Allows Mahindra’s ₹3.26 Cr Sales Promotion Claim- Brand Promotion is Revenue, Even if Benefits Endure Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., as successor to Mahindra Two Wheelers Ltd. & Mahindra Trucks & Buses Ltd., filed appeal before Tribunal against CIT(A) order confirming disallowance of ₹3.26 Cr advertisement & sales promotion expenses incurred towards “Mahindra Parts Plazas”.  AO ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bangalore ITAT Upholds Section 11 Exemption Despite Alleged Capitation Fee Collections Bangalore ITAT Allows Mine Development Expenditure as Revenue Expense; Deletes Double Addition ITAT Allows Exemption for BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition; Cash Redeposit from Earlier Property Sale Accepted Entire Sales Receipts Cannot Be Taxed Under Section 69A: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930