Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shakti Developers Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shakti Developers Vs ITO (ITAT Surat) Capital Introduced by Partners Cannot Be Taxed in Firm’s Hands: ITAT Surat Deletes Addition of Rs. 2.52 Crore Assessee, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed Nil return for A.Y. 2017-18. AO, in absence of compliance, passed ex parte assessment u/s 144 on 15.12.2019 making addition of Rs. 2.52 crore as unexplained investment u/s 69, being capital introduced by partners, & Rs. 3 lakh as unexplained loan u/s 68. Entire amount was further taxed u/s 115BBE at 60% with surcharge. Before CIT(A), Assessee submitted that capital was int...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Chennai ITAT: Bogus Purchase Addition Cannot Rest on Suspicion; Search Data Must Be Corroborated with Independent Evidence No Bogus LTCG Addition Without Proof of Price Manipulation Linking Assessee: ITAT Raipur Bad Debt Write-off Enough After TRF Ltd.; Verify Only Section 36(2): ITAT Bangalore Ad Hoc Disallowance Without Defects Unsustainable; GST/TDS Late Fee Remanded: ITAT Lucknow Section 115BAB Benefit Can’t Be Denied Over Internal Appeal Allocation: ITAT Raipur View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031