Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kriteshwar Prasad Singh Vs ACIT/DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kriteshwar Prasad Singh Vs ACIT/DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Adjustment u/s 143(1) Without Prior Intimation Quashed – ITAT Ahmedabad Rules in Favour of ONGC Employee Assessee, an ONGC employee, filed return declaring income of ₹89.76 lakh & claimed exemption of ₹6.34 lakh u/s 10(10AA) for leave encashment on retirement. CPC, Bengaluru, while processing u/s 143(1), restricted exemption to ₹3 lakh, treating ONGC employees as non-Govt employees, resulting in an addition of ₹3.34 lakh. Assessee argued that: No prior intimation was issued before making adjustment, violating the first provis...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930