Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bombay Tyres Vs ITO ( ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bombay Tyres Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Duplicate PAN & Wrong Assessment Nullified – ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹3.18 Cr Cash Addition on Non-Existent Entity Assessee’s case arose from an ex parte assessment u/s 144 r.w.s. 144A, wherein AO treated cash deposits of ₹3.18 crore in Federal Bank, Vashi, as unexplained money u/s 69A, besides estimating business income at 8% of total credits. Assessee contended that these deposits pertained to the proprietary concern “Bombay Tyres” of Shri Rohit Rajgopal Soman (PAN: AYSPS1288G) & not to the PAN AAGCB1604E, which was inadvertently allotted to ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Bogus LTCG Addition Without Proof of Price Manipulation Linking Assessee: ITAT Raipur Bad Debt Write-off Enough After TRF Ltd.; Verify Only Section 36(2): ITAT Bangalore Ad Hoc Disallowance Without Defects Unsustainable; GST/TDS Late Fee Remanded: ITAT Lucknow Section 115BAB Benefit Can’t Be Denied Over Internal Appeal Allocation: ITAT Raipur CIT(A) Must Decide Jurisdiction Before Remanding Reassessment to AO: ITAT Raipur View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031