Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Renu Jagdishwar Sood Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Renu Jagdishwar Sood Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Unexplained Property Investment Case: Addition Deleted When Co-Owner (Husband) Made Payments; Ex-Parte Assessment Challenged: Authorities Must Verify Evident Facts in Unexplained Investment Cases; Section 69 Addition Fails: Investment Not in Relevant Year & Paid by Co-Owner’s Husband AO reopened assessment based on information from the Sub-Registrar’s Office that Assessee had purchased property worth ₹51.92 lakh, allegedly representing unexplained investment u/s 69. Assessee did not attend proceedings, leading to an ex-parte assessment...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Bogus LTCG Addition Without Proof of Price Manipulation Linking Assessee: ITAT Raipur Bad Debt Write-off Enough After TRF Ltd.; Verify Only Section 36(2): ITAT Bangalore Ad Hoc Disallowance Without Defects Unsustainable; GST/TDS Late Fee Remanded: ITAT Lucknow Section 115BAB Benefit Can’t Be Denied Over Internal Appeal Allocation: ITAT Raipur CIT(A) Must Decide Jurisdiction Before Remanding Reassessment to AO: ITAT Raipur View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031