Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs. Smt. Umayal Annamalai (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2005-06
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Summary- The assessee has not invested in Capital Gain Account Scheme before 139(1) of the Act but complied with the conditions under section 54F(1) of the Act by purchasing and construction of residential property within three years from the date of transfer of original asset which is not disputed in the assessment proceedings or in appellate proceedings. The provisions of section 54F are beneficial provisions and are to be considered liberally in the aspect of limitation period. The Brief facts of the case that the assessee is an individual having income from salary, income from house prope...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930