Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bolkunda Pachwai & (S) C.S. Shop vs. Income-tax Officer (ITAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : I.T.A Nos. 165 & 166/Kol/2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 25.07.2016
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09 & 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
CA Saurabh Chokhra

Brief of the case:

  • The ITAT Kolkata in the above cited case held that the consequence, which were to be fall on  account of non-observation of section 40A(3) must have nexus to the failure of object of introducing of the provision. Therefore, no disallowance can be made if the transactions do not defeat the object of Sec 40A(3) in as much as there genuiness is not challenged and they can be tracked end to end.
  • Therefore , deposit in bank account of supplier in compliance with govt. regulations who is wholesale dealer  where genuiness of transaction is not disputed by revenue cannot be disallowed  as the same is routed through banking channel making evasion of taxes difficult thus, not defeating the provisions of Sec 40A(3).

    Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031