Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT, Hyderabad Vs Deccan Grameen Bank (ITAT Hyderabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1536 & 1579
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/06/2015
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brief Facts of the case:

First Issue:

The assessee a regional rural bank is doing banking activity in the state of undivided AP. For the AY under consideration, assessee filed its return of income on declaring total income of Rs. 36,33,59,291. During the assessment proceeding, AO noticed that assessee has claimed an amount of Rs. 1,58,65,512 as broken period interest paid on purchase of securities.

He disallowed such interest taking the view that the same is not allowable as per the Act. Being aggrieved of such disallowance, assessee preferred appeal before CIT (A).

CIT(A) after considering the submissions of assessee found that ITAT, Hyderabad Bench in case of SBH Vs. JCIT [2005] has held that broken period interest paid by assessee bank is allowable as deduction. Thus, relying on the same judgment he allowed the broken period interest. Aggrieved by the CIT(A)’s order the department preferred an appeal to ITAT.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031