This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Article 227 Cannot Be Used to Strike Off Plaint When CPC Remedy Exists – SC Restores Suit
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- P. Suresh Vs D. Kalaivani & Ors. (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
P. Suresh Vs D. Kalaivani & Ors. (Supreme Court of India)
Article 227 Cannot Be Used to Strike Off Plaint When CPC Remedy Exists — SC Restores Suit
The Supreme Court of India has emphatically held that High Courts cannot invoke supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution to strike off or reject a plaint when a specific statutory remedy under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is available, particularly Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
In the present case, the Madras High Court, exercising powers u/Art.227, had struck off the plaint in a suit for permanent injunct...






