Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : A/10818-10819/2015
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/06/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brief Facts of the case:

The appellant (assessee) is manufacturing Linear Alkyl Benzene Feed Stock (LABFS) and Low Aluminum Rolling Oil (LARO).The order passed by the adjudicating authority dated 30.9.2010 does not dispute the classification of both the above products under CETH 2710.29 but the second order in original dated 31.12.2012 held that both the products to be classifiable under CETH 2710.99.Revenue was of the opinion that both these products are not eligible to exemption under Notification No. 75/84-CE as the said exemption is applicable to such Kerosene which is ordinarily used as illuminant in oil burning lamps.

Thus, the exemption u/NN. 75/84-CE was denied to the assessee. Aggrieved by the order of Commissioner of Central Excise assessee preferred an appeal before the CESTAT.

Contention of the Assessee:

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031