SC Held that mere acceptance of the rent by the landlord after the expiry of the period of lease would not amount to waiver of the termination of lease.
Sunil Kumar Jian and Others Vs Sundaresh Bhatt and Others (Supreme Court) Whether the amounts of provident fund, gratuity, and pension fund should be separated from the liquidation and other rights of workmen in liquidation process The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sunil Kumar Jian and Others v. Sundaresh Bhatt and Others (decided […]
The show cause notice is the foundation on which the department has to build up its case. If the allegations in the show cause notice are not specific and are on the contrary vague, lack details and/or unintelligible that is sufficient to hold that the noticee was not given proper opportunity to meet the allegations indicated in the show cause notice.
Charu Kishor Mehta Vs Prakash Patel & Ors. (Supreme Court) Apart from making a bald statement of collusion between Defendant Nos. 1, 2 & 4 and the secured creditor, i.e., M/s. Phoenix A.R.C. Pvt. Ltd. there is nothing substantial as to how and as to what precise fraud has been committed. The only case of […]
Saurashtra Chemicals Ltd. Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd (Supreme Court) BRIEF FACTS: 1. The appellant purchased a standard fire and special perils policy from the respondent National Insurance Company Ltd. thereby insuring the risk of loss/damage to the stock of coal and lignite stored in its factory compound. 2. An additional premium was paid by […]
High Court was incorrect and wrong in quashing the criminal prosecution only on the ground that the tribunal has granted stay, subject to condition of pre-deposit, of the recovery of the tax and the penalty amount.
SC held that The period of limitation shall be governed by the Act and not by Section 44A of the CPC, since the latter provides only for the procedure to be followed for executing a foreign decree
SC held that In Case Of Specific Risks, such as those arising from loss due to fire etc. , the Insured Cannot profit and take advantage by double Insurance.
Since there are many ambiguity in definition of various social welfare laws in India. They have not clearly defined the Workmen and each laws define Workmen differently. The Apex Court of India in above case define ( what constitutes as a workman and as to what differentiates contract of service from contract for service).
Shri M.L. Patil (Dead) Through LRs Vs The State of Goa and Anr. (Supreme Court of India) High Court has held that action of the State Government in requiring the original petitioners to retire at the age of 58 years or not permitting them to continue in their service upto the age of 60 years […]
