Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bank of Baroda Vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. (Supreme Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bank of Baroda Vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. (Supreme Court) SC held that The period of limitation shall be governed by the Act and not by Section 44A of the CPC,  since the latter provides only for the procedure to be followed for executing a foreign  decree BRIEF FACTS. 1. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. issued a Letter of Credit for US $1,794,258 on behalf of its customer M/s. Aditya Steel Industries Limited in favour of M/s. Granada Worldwide Investment  Company, London. 2. The appellant Bank of Baroda was the confirming bank to the said letter of credit. 3. The Vysya Bank issued instructions to...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

A Qualified Company Secretary, LLB , FIII , CIAFP Certified Bsc( Maths) BHU & Certification in Insurance Risk Management ( ICSI-III) have completed Limited Insolvency Examination and having more than 24 years of experience in the field of Secretarial Practice, Project Finance, Direct Taxes View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Moratorium Under IBC Applies to All Proceedings: NCLT Mumbai No Section 138 NI Act Offense if Cheque Presented for Full Amount After Partial Payment Risk Commencement Date Under Insurance Policy Banks cannot be restrained from selling mortgaged property: SC IBC Section 17: Can a Managing Director Refuse Duties During CIRP? View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930