Supreme Court held that Mosquito Mats, Coils and Vaporizers and Mortein Insect Killers; Harpic Toilet Cleaner and Lizol Floor Cleaners are subject to 12.5% VAT and Dettol falling under entry 36(8)(h)(vi) of Schedule III of KVAT Act is subject to 4% VAT.
Supreme Court held that rule 3A(2) of the Tripura Sales Tax Rules, 1976 (TST Rules) are not ultra vires to Tripura Sales Tax Act, 1976 (TST Act). Accordingly, 4% tax deductible on transfer of right to use goods.
Meaning of commercial purpose under Consumer Protection Act for reimbursement of claim on account of fire at Godown of a commercial enterprise
CIT Vs Laxman Dass Khandelwal (Supreme Court of India) After filing a return of income u/s 139(1), 139(4), 139(5), 142(1) if income tax authority considers, it is necessary or expedient to ensure that assessee has not understated the income or has not computed excessive loss or has not under-paid the taxes in any manner, shall […]
Salil Gulati Vs ACIT (Supreme Court of India) Hon’ble Supreme Court today in SLP No. 7466/2023 in Salil Gulati v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax has dismissed the SLP. The SLP had challenged the fresh reassessment notices for AY 2014-15 under 148A(b) issued after the Hon’ble SC judgment in Ashish Aggarwal case, on the ground […]
SC held that declaration in bill of entry as goods and acceptance under Customs cannot be determinative of transaction and import of design and drawings in a paper was import of service liable for service tax under applicable provisions.
Whether Duty drawback and DEPB received as an incentive for exports can be said to be derived from the business of industrial undertaking and thus eligible for the benefits of Section 80-IB of Income-tax Act, 1961?
Mansarovar Commercial Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT (Supreme Court of India) Sub- What is the meaning of management and control for the purpose of determining residency of a company? Whether simply registered office of a company can be the criterion ? The Supreme Court in this case was considering interesting question as to taxability of alleged […]
SC held that no penalty shall be leviable under Section 271C of Income Tax Act for mere belated remittance of TDS after deducting
Supreme Court held that separate notice u/s. 11A of the Central Excise Act not required when the order-in-original sanctioning the refund came set aside in a proceedings u/s 35E of the Central Excise Act.
