Refund set aside in proceedings u/s 35E sufficient, separate notice u/s 11A not required

Commissioner of Central Excise  Mumbai Vs Morarjee Gokuldas Spg. & Wvg. Co. Ltd. (Supreme Court of India)

Supreme Court held that separate notice u/s. 11A of the Central Excise Act not required when the order-in-original sanctioning the refund came set aside in a proceedings u/s 35E of the Central Excise Act.

Facts- Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 24.09.2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Central Excis

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.