A division bench of the Bengaluru ITAT, on Tuesday held that the distribution fee paid by Google India to Google Ireland for use of its Ad words programme is taxable in India as royalty under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
M/s Drawmet Wires Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ACIT (ITAT Jaipur) It is settled proposition of law that DDT is chargeable only in the year when it is declared, distributed or paid and not prior to that. In the case on hand the assessee has produced all relevant record to show that the dividend was proposed by […]
Making purchases through the grey market gives the assessee savings on account of non-payment of tax and others at the expense of the exchequer. In such situation, in our considered opinion, on the facts and circumstances of the case, 12.5% disallowance out of the bogus purchases meets the end of justice. Accordingly, I hold that the disallowance should be restricted to 12.5% of the bogus purchases.
This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -17, Mumbai dated 29.01.2015 for the Assessment Year 2010-11.
In the absence of any specific mention of the Assessing Officer in the assessment order for charging of interest u/s 234A and 234B, no interest would be recovered from the assessee merely by way of a demand notice.
The issue is with respect to levy of penalty under section 271B of the Act. It is an undisputed fact that assessee is engaged in the business of Advertising Agency and during the year under consideration the commission earned from the Advertising Agency was not in excess of the limits prescribed under section 44AB for the purpose of getting the books audited.
The Bengaluru ITAT, on Wednesday, confirmed the dis allowance of interest expenses claimed on advances received under sub-Lease agreement since there was a defect in the title of the assessee on the subject property.
TDS requirement under section 194C is not applicable to transactions of purchase of goods, therefore, no disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) could be made.
Merely for the reason that the assessee had admitted additional income in the course of search for taxation, it cannot be said that such admitted income was undisclosed income within the meaning of ‘undisclosed income’ provided in Explanation to section 271AAA of the Act to impose the penalty.
This is an appeal filed by the revenue against the order of learned Commissioner (A)-9, Kolkata dated 24-11-2015 for assessment year 2006-07.
