Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Shri Ravi Kumar Khaitan (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2012- 13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Shri Ravi Kumar Khaitan (ITAT Kolkata)

Merely for the reason that the assessee had admitted additional income in the course of search for taxation, it cannot be said that such admitted income was undisclosed income within the meaning of ‘undisclosed income’ provided in Explanation to section 271AAA of the Act to impose the penalty. We concur with the Ld. CIT(A) that when the income disclosed u/s 132(4) in the course of search, itself cannot be treated as undisclosed income within the

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31