JCL Infra Ltd. Vs Addl. CIT (TDS) CGO Complex-I (ITAT Delhi) Severe financial crisis is a reasonable cause which would have prevented the asssessee from depositing the TDS within the prescribed time period. In such a circumstance, we hold that the explanation offered by the assessee would constitute ‘reasonable cause’ within the meaning of section 273B […]
As notice issued under section 274 read with section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961 did not specify particular viz., whether assessee had concealed particulars of income or had furnished inaccurate particulars thereof, hence, levy of penalty could not be sustained.
Recently, in the Kanaka Mahalakshmi Cooperative Bank Ltd. vs. ACIT & vice-versa [ITA Nos. 299 & 300/VIZ/2017 and ITA Nos. 326 & 327/VIZ/2017, (A.Y.: 2012-13 & 2013-14), decided on 5.9.2018], there were cross appeals by the assessee and the Revenue for the AYs 2012-13 & 2013 & 14. In ITA No. 299/VIZ/2007, one of the ground related to the addition of Rs. 26,10,443/- on account of interest on reverse fund.
Interest expenditure could be allowed only if the loan was borrowed for the purpose of the business of the assessee and if it is used for the purchase of an asset which yielded exempted income, that interest expenditure cannot be allowed u/s. 36(1)(iii) of the Act.
Explore Amar Das’ ITAT case. Section 50C, capital gains clarified. Rs. 43,22,878 addition overturned. Get insights on tax implications.
A.O. applied the deeming provisions of Section 50C of the I.T. Act, for the purpose of making the addition. Thus, the A. O. did not bring any positive evidence on record to show that assessee has concealed particulars of income or furnished any inaccurate particulars.
Hemkunt Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) To decide nature of income received from letting out of property the deciding factor is not ownership of premises but the nature of activity of assessee and nature of operations in relation thereto. As evident from assessees memorandum, objects of the company were to buy, purchase or […]
Ayub Ali Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur) The assessee has entered into an agreement with a Government Hospital in Bikaner whereby it operates the MRI and CT Scan machines. The nature of such activities therefore demand a continuous supply of electricity and the assessee cannot risk the life of the patients especially those admitted in emergency […]
Nitin Kumar Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata) Interest under section 234A is charged for delay in filing of the return from the prescribed due date. The cash was seized from the possession of the assessee before due date of filing of return under section 139(1) in the relevant assessment year when such seizure took place. Thus, […]
JRA & Associates Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) After perusal of the partnership deed in the assessee’s case it can be seen that the CBDT Circular in Clause 4 has categorically mentioned that even the method of quantification can be accepted as per the provisions of Section 40(b) (v) of the Act. Besides that the Hon’ble […]
