ITAT held that addition of loss from traded in penny stock not justified if no information about engagement of assessee in manipulative activities and details of purchase/sales of shares submitted by him was not doubted.
Interest income earned by assessee on its investments with a co-operative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under Sec. 80P(2)(d) of Act.
Maharashtra Film Stage and Cultural Development Corporation Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) The assessee had written off the bad debt as per the Board Resolution dt.5.6.2009 after the closing of books of accounts. The Assessing Officer had disallowed the claim on the ground that books of accounts were closed on 31.3.2009 whereas bad debts were […]
Unless, there is an evidence of remission or cessation of liability, provisions of Section 41(1) of the Act does not apply.
Held that as per agreement, the assessee will hand over physical possession of the property only after the purchaser obtains Intimation of Disapproval. Hence, till the property is not transferred as per the terms of agreement, capital gain on the same cannot be taxed.
ITAT held that merely for not producing the cash creditors before the Ld. AO even when all the necessary documents as required to prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the cash creditors are furnished by the assessee, cannot be a reasonable basis to make addition for unexplained cash credit u/s 68 of the Act.
Viral Ashish Parikh Vs ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) it is transpired that the assessee can be granted immunity from disallowances of expenses on account of non/short deduction of taxes provided that the assessee (payer) furnishes the certificate in the prescribed form. Thus the onus is upon the assessee. However we find that assessee has not furnished […]
DCIT Vs Virendrabhai Devjibhai Patel (ITAT Surat) ITAT observed that the transactions were done by the assessee and the real investment in the transaction was carried out by Shri. Dharmeshbhai Patel (in short SDP). The assessee and Shri. Dharmeshbhai Patel (SDP) entered into an arrangement wherein, Shri. Dharmeshbhai Patel (SDP) provided the money required to […]
ITAT Chandigarh held that the aggregator/ intermediary (OLA) acts merely as an intermediary and hence not liable to deduct TDS u/s 194C on payments made to drivers.
No Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) for filing inaccurate particulars of income when assessee filed Revised Return offering to tax rental income
