Fee u/s. 234E for filing TDS returns belatedly could not be levied prior to 01/06/2015 as there was no machinery provision of sec. 200A .
Where assessee-firm claimed to have received unsecured loans during relevant years, however, it could not prove genuineness of unsecured loan taken and underneath sources for making these investments, addition made by Assessing Officer under section 68 was justified
Where Assessing Officer, after following directions of Principal Commissioner regarding examining of claim made by assessee for exemption under section 54F, passed an assessment order under section 143(3) read with section 263 holding that assessee was eligible for exemption as it held only one residential property during year, subsequent revision order passed by Principal Commissioner setting aside impugned assessment order as erroneous and prejudicial to interest of revenue was to be quashed
In case, Assessing Officer finds that if property is accounted in books of firm M/s. S.P. Hospital as a commercial property and the property is used for the purpose of hospital, then the Assessing Officer is directed to allow deduction under section 54F of the Act.
Assessee was entitled to the benefit of indexation on the total cost of acquisition from the year of allotment of flat dehors the fact that assessee had paid installments over a period of time subsequent to the date of allotment.
Income from letting out of premises/developing space along with other facilities in an industrial park, SEZ is taxable under business income
ACIT Vs AVA landmark LLP (ITAT Delhi) The capital assets held by erstwhile company transferred to assessee as LLP were considered as transfer and the Assessing officer made addition of Rs.11,37,40,244/- to the return income on allegation of non-compliance of Section 47(xiiib) of the Act. However, the Ld. CIT(A) observed that there is no violation […]
Shri Abdul Hakeem Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) ITAT notice that the assessee has filed the appeal belatedly where the number of days delayed has not been specified. The delay in our understanding is about 14 months 10 days. No explanation worth the name has been provided to justify the delay. It is trite that the […]
The tide up grants for a specific purpose would only mean that the assessee which was voluntarily organization, had agree to act as a trustee of a special fund granted by the donor with the result that it need not be pooled or integrated with the assessee is normal income or corpus.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that loans to staff members is not business expenses and therefore interest earned on such loans cannot be treated as business income.
