ITAT Ahmedabad held that construction cost attributable to 5 offices out of total 11 offices should be worked out on weighted basis and not on average basis as the properties mainly of the ground floor and first floor were sold out. Such properties fetches higher value in terms of sale price and hence cost is also attributable on weighted basis.
ITAT Bangalore based on the judgement of Datacraft India Ltd. held that if the networking equipment is used as a part of the computer in its functions, then the same will be classified as computers for the purpose of depreciation.
The ITAT while dismissing the assessees appeal observed that the assessee has transferred his share of right and interest over the property in favour of his father through relinquishment deed dated 14.10.2014, which is after entering into sale agreement on 28.1.2014 and as per section 2(47)(i) of the Income Tax Act, transfer in relation to a capital asset, includes, the sale, exchange or relinquishment of assets. Therefore, the Order of AO wherein it was held that the assessee could not claim any exemption on the capital gains was upheld.
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that liquidated damages are incidental business income but cannot be said to be profit from core or incidental activity. As there are not directly received from the core activity, they doesnt form part of computation in tonnage tax.
ITAT Mumbai held that property sold in individual capacity cannot be claimed to be owned by the partnership firm simply by way of making entries in the books of accounts of the partnership firm. Accordingly, Capital gain on sale of property taxable in hands of individual.
ITAT Mumbai held that loss of clients incurred under Options Maxima Scheme claimed by the assessee (being an agent) in its return is not allowable.
ITAT Pune held that depreciation on items like stainless steel table, tools, trollies used by scientist or lab technicians in laboratory are used for production of vaccine/ other is allowable at the rate applicable to plant and machinery
Ragavs Diagnostic & Research Centre Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) From the plain reading of section 69C, it is clear that when an assessee offers no explanation or the explanation offered is not satisfactory in the opinion of the AO, then the amount of such expenditure is to be taxed as income u/s. 69C […]
AO made additions on ground that cash deposited in bank account was more than total turnover declared by assessee, since assessee furnished bank statements which showed that there were deposits and withdrawals of almost equal amounts and AO failed to give any findings regarding said withdrawals, assessee deserved to get benefit of telescoping and thus, addition was unjustified
Mankind Pharma Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) The issue in the present ground is with respect to the disallowance of sale promotion expenses of Rs.1,06,78,600/- by holding it to be covered by Explanation of Section 37(1) of the Act. We find that Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Apex Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. (supra) has […]
