This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Satisfaction recorded by AO should not be based on conjectures & surmises
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ragavs Diagnostic & Research Centre Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Ragavs Diagnostic & Research Centre Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
From the plain reading of section 69C, it is clear that when an assessee offers no explanation or the explanation offered is not satisfactory in the opinion of the AO, then the amount of such expenditure is to be taxed as income u/s. 69C of the Act. The satisfaction to be recorded by the AO should not be objective satisfaction exercised at his discretion, but a subjective satisfaction based on the facts of the case. It would then mean that justification for exercise of the power has to be found by the authority by makin...




