ITAT Kolkata held that original assessment was made under section 143(3)/147, i.e. scrutiny assessments. Further, there was no fresh information available with the revenue. Hence, reopening of assessments relying on the same information is invalid.
DCIT Vs Sikraft Infotech Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai) Software Development expenses claimed by the assessee are in the nature of payment of salaries and allowances to the Engineers, travelling expenses, etc. The assessee is engaged in the process of providing automation, software and hardware engineering. The said expenditure is in the regular course of business […]
Kamla Devi Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) In the present case, from the orders of the authorities below, it is clear that the authorities below have treated interest received by the assessee on enhanced compensation u/s 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1984 as ‘Income from other sources’ and denied exemption u/s 10(37) of the Act. […]
BMC Software India P. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) ITAT Pune held that charges of Primary Rate Interface doesn’t require human intervention and hence doesn’t qualify as fees for technical services. Accordingly, TDS not deductible u/s 194J of the Income Tax Act. Facts- Assessee challenged the disallowance of Primary Rate Interface (PRI) line charges paid […]
ITAT Chandigarh held that addition in the business income merely on the basis of closing bank balance unsustainable as there is nothing on record to show that assessee had any other income except agricultural income.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that expenditure incurred for education of the daughter, who pursued the very same profession in which the father was, doesn’t make the same business expenditure. Father was morally bound to spend on the education of his daughter and hence the same is personal expenditure.
ITAT Delhi held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as claim of deduction u/s. 80IA(4) already decided in favour of the assessee.
ITAT Bangalore held that for invoking the provisions of unexplained cash credit u/s 68 there has to be entries in the books of account for which no explanation should have been offered. As the declaration provided by the assessee is self-explanatory the provisions of section 68 cannot be invoked.
Bhawneshwar Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) In the instant case, the matter relates to claim of interest paid by the assessee to the partnership firm where the assessee is a partner and from where the assessee also draws the remuneration. Both the interest paid and remuneration received from the partnership firm has been duly reflected […]
ACIT Vs Exclusive Motors Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi) Undisputedly, the assessing officer has concluded that part of the remittances made by assessee to CCPL towards extended warranty services are in the nature of profit attributable to the PE in India, hence, assessee was required to deduct tax at source on such remittances. He also held […]
