ITAT Raipur held that charging of late fees of delay in filing of TDS statement under section 234E of the Income Tax Act is effective only from 01.06.2015. Charging the same for period prior to 01.06.2015 is untenable in law.
ITAT Delhi held that as no adjustment on transfer pricing issue would subsist and therefore there is no question of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act on such addition.
Requirement to allow TDS credit on Salary is only of amount of tax deducted at source & not getting deposited with Government after deduction.
Victory for Sanjay Duggal as ITAT Delhi quashes assessments under 153A, nullifying penalties. Learn why the penalty orders couldn’t survive. Decided in favor of the assessee.
ITAT Rajkot held that the claim of deduction u/s 80P of the Act cannot be denied only on the basis that the assessee did not file its return of income within due date u/s 139(1) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition merely on the basis of seized paper which is neither signed nor dated, without any corroborative evidence, is untenable in law.
ITAT Delhi held that the centralised services fee received by the assessee cannot be treated as FTS under Article 12 of the India-Singapore tax treaty, hence not taxable in India.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that the disallowances made under section 14A read with rule 8D cannot be the subject matter of disallowances while determining the net profit u/s 115JB of the Income Tax Act.
No TDS is required to be deducted on EDC payments made to HUDA, as these payments were made on the directions of DTCP which are deposited with the Consolidated Fund of State,
ITAT Mumbai held that provisions of Article 24 of DTAA between India and Singapore will be applicable only when condition no. 1, condition no. 2 and condition no. 3 in paragraph 4.2 are satisfied simultaneously. Here as condition no. 1 is not satisfied, DTAA would not be attracted in case of GCC.
