ITAT Delhi held that bona fide error cannot be basis of imposition of penalty and hence imposition of penalty under section 270A of the Income Tax Act rightly deleted by First Appellate Authority.
ITAT Bangalore held that imposition of penalty under section 270A of the Income Tax Act on account of underreporting of income not justified as failing to furnish income tax return was bona fide.
ITAT Jaipur upholds the deletion of ₹1.71 crore in excessive and bogus expenses in the case of ACIT vs Nisha Jain for AY 2013-14. The tribunal dismisses Revenue’s appeal citing lack of merit.
Explore the ITAT Jaipur ruling in ACIT vs. Naresh Jain, addressing key legal points, survey statements, and additions involving incriminating documents and unaccounted transactions in the 2017-18 assessment year.
Summary of the ITAT Jaipur decision in Singhal Builders Vs ACIT for A.Y. 2017-18, discussing income additions, depreciation claims, and treatment of interest on income tax refund.
ITAT Bangalore held that interest/ dividend from co-operative society is eligible for deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act. However, if payer bank is co-operative bank then deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) is not available.
ITAT Jaipur upheld the deletion of Rs. 72 lakh addition, ruling that the assessee sufficiently explained the source of cash deposits made during demonetization.
ITAT Chennai quashes penalty under sections 271(1)(c) and 271A for AY 2012-13 to 2016-17 in the Srinivasan Chandrasekara case, citing legal deficiencies.
ITAT Delhi held that addition towards undisclosed investment in shares and unsecured loans merely based on observation made by DCIT without independent inquiry by AO is unjustified and hence the addition is liable to be deleted.
ITAT Delhi held that addition based on reliance placed on third party statement without any corroborated evidence is not sustainable in law. Accordingly, issue restored to AO for de novo adjudication.
