ITAT Chandigarh ruled on Ashish Sood Vs DCIT case, deciding whether Foreign Tax Credit is eligible when Form 67 is filed after due date but before assessment.
ITAT Delhi held that Rule 128(9) nowhere debars claim of Foreign Tax Credit on account of delay in furnishing Form No. 67. The provisions contained under Rule 128(9) are directory and accordingly, allowed the credit of FTC.
ITAT Ahmedabad ruled on tax treatment for Smt. Pashiben Prajapati Trust, clarifying the application of Section 164 and deductions under Chapter VI-A.
Summary of cross appeals involving VAT disallowances under Section 43B for AY 2018-19, addressing accounting methods, CIT(A) decision, and case law reliance.
The ITAT Indore remanded Amit Vyas’ appeal back to CIT(A) due to procedural delays, allowing reconsideration of unexplained cash deposits and assessment orders.
ITAT Indore remands case of District Organiser Tribal Welfare Bhopal vs. ITO for incorrect TDS calculations and procedural delays. Read the full judgment summary.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that restriction of addition to Rs. 1.45 crore from Rs. 9 crore towards unexplained cash credit on account of share application money by CIT(A) justified as the same was based on evidences.
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not leviable as AO had not demonstrated any falsehood in the particulars provided by assessee. Mere making a claim that was not legally sustainable did not constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars of income by assessee.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that it is mandatory for the AO to refer the valuation to the DVO if the assessee objects to the adoption of the stamp duty value and claims that the value adopted exceeds the fair market value.
ITAT Bangalore held that dismissal of appeal by CIT(A) for non-payment of an amount equal to the amount of advance tax unjustified as assessee has explained good and sufficient reason for not paying the amount.
