ITAT Kolkata allows Nalanda Builders appeal on property sale valuation but upholds disallowance of short-term capital loss on share sales. Key details inside.
ITAT Kolkata ruled in favor of Narayani Laxmi Viniyog Pvt. Ltd., applying a 22% tax rate under Section 115BAA despite CPC’s 40% tax assessment for AY 2023-24.
ITAT Kolkata allows appeal, deletes Rs. 1,99,911 penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for commission income estimation dispute.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition u/s. 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act for delayed payment of employees’ contributions to PF and ESIC based on mis-reporting by the auditor in the audit report is unjustified. Accordingly, addition restriction.
ITAT Bangalore held that the co-operative societies providing credit facilities to its members is entitled to deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act. Thus, income earned on account of providing credit facilities is allowable as deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i).
ITAT Delhi held that cess fees received by the board is income derived from property held under trust and is thus taxable and the same cannot be treated as capital receipt.
The CIT(A) after examining the issue deleted the addition. No document controverting findings of the CIT(A) are brought on record by the Revenue. We find no infirmity in findings of the CIT(A)on this issue. Hence, the same are upheld.
Aggrieved, the assessee challenged the matter in appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). However, the same was dismissed. Being aggrieved, the present appeal is filed.
Reassessment order was quashed on cash deposits as AO did not possess any credible information to form a belief that income had escaped assessment and there was non-application of mind for reopening the matter.
Addition of cash deposit under section 68 was not justified as the same could only be invoked if the taxpayer maintained books of accounts and assessee filed an income tax return under Section 44AD which did not require books of accounts.
