Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ishtiaq Ahmad Rather Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ishtiaq Ahmad Rather Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar)

Conclusion: Addition of cash deposit under section 68 was not justified as the same could only be invoked if the taxpayer maintained books of accounts and assessee filed an income tax return under Section 44AD which did not require books of accounts.

Held: Assessee was engaged in retail trading of hardware and ceramics, filed a presumptive income return under Section 44AD for the assessment year 2016-17. AO found that assessee had deposited Rs.1195000 and Rs. 8658000 in the HDFC savings bank accoun

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31