Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ishtiaq Ahmad Rather Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. Nos. 316 & 317/Asr/2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/09/2024
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ishtiaq Ahmad Rather Vs ITO (ITAT Amritsar)

Conclusion: Addition of cash deposit under section 68 was not justified as the same could only be invoked if the taxpayer maintained books of accounts and assessee filed an income tax return under Section 44AD which did not require books of accounts.

Held: APlease become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
October 2024
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031