Madras HC allows Aashi Creations to re-export seized consignment pending adjudication, subject to a bond covering differential duty and a 20% bank guarantee on redetermined value.
AP High Court sets aside GST penalty, ruling that the summary assessment order (DRC-07) must be signed and issuance of mandatory Rule 142(1A) notice is necessary.
Punjab & Haryana High Court warns lawyers against using mobile phones to search Google/AI for answers to court queries, urging them to prepare in advance or face strict action.
Gauhati High Court allows a taxpayer a fresh two-month window to apply for GST registration restoration after the 270-day deadline passed, provided all dues are cleared.
MP High Court sets aside GST cancellation for non-filing, allowing restoration on condition of submitting all pending returns and paying a penalty of for default.
Bombay High Court held that invocation of provisions of Rule 86-A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and blocking of Input Tax Credit not justified since Input Tax Credit available in Electronic Credit Ledger was ‘NIL’. Accordingly, petition is allowed.
Calcutta HC emphasized that uploading GST orders and proceedings on the official portal constitutes valid service under Section 169. Writ petition challenging the order without pursuing alternate remedies was dismissed with costs.
The court held that an impugned GST order was not properly uploaded under the “view notices and orders” tab, affecting the petitioner’s ability to respond. HC directed the assessing officer to issue a fresh notice with proper service and timeline for reply.
The Madras High Court ruled that a GST summary demand order in Form DRC-07 is invalid if the mandatory show-cause notice in Form DRC-01 was not issued first, even if a preliminary notice (DRC-01A) was sent.
Kerala High Court recalls its 2024 order after finding petitioner’s GST refund plea was wrongly linked to a batch case challenging Section 16(2)(c) of CGST Act.
