Tripura High Court rules that collection of GST penalty without passing a formal order under Section 129(3) is unlawful, and directs refund with interest.
Delhi High Court sets aside GST orders passed without notice or opportunity for reply and remands the matter to the adjudicating authority for personal hearing.
Madras High Court relegates the GST classification dispute on Harpic and Lizol to the Deputy Commissioner, noting factual disputes and the availability of statutory remedies.
Delhi High Court uncovered fraudulent Input Tax Credit claims after a trader sought GST registration cancellation and imposed ₹5 lakh costs for misleading submissions.
Kerala High Court held that the excess GST liability pertaining to the transactions relating to the contract is question needs to be reimbursed to the petitioner as per the terms and conditions stated in the contract. Accordingly, writ allowed to that extent.
Bombay High Court held that passing of impugned order denying rebate claim under rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules without dealing with crucial issues and without considering the submissions is not justifiable. Accordingly, order is set aside and matter is remanded back.
High Court refused to entertain a writ petition challenging a GST demand involving alleged fraudulent ITC, holding that disputed facts must be resolved through the statutory appeal process.
The Bombay High Court ruled that the CIT cannot exercise revision powers under Section 263 when the Assessing Officer has verified the identity, source, and creditworthiness of foreign donors and satisfied with gifts received.
The J&K High Court directed restoration of GST registration for a petitioner who undertook to deposit taxes, penalties, and interest, after prior cancellation for non-response to a show-cause notice.
The J&K High Court directed restoration of GST registration for a petitioner who undertook to deposit taxes, penalties, and interest, after prior cancellation for non-response to a show-cause notice.
