Madras High Court permits a delayed appeal against GST penalty order, provided 25% of disputed tax and interest on belated payment are deposited, emphasizing conditional relief.
The Court remanded the matter after finding that the taxpayer had not filed a reply or received a proper hearing before the order was passed. The adjudicating authority must reconsider the case after granting full opportunity.
The Court directed issuance of a new PAN after a duplicate allotment caused the petitioner’s financial record to be linked to another person’s loan defaults.
Madras High Court held that order of attachment of immovable property is required to be lifted as recovery officer is bound to give effect to order of higher authority. Accordingly, since entire arrears is already paid as per order passed by ITAT.
Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed on insurance premiums for stock, plant & machinery, and business premises (under a Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy) could not be denied by treating it as “motor vehicle insurance
High Court sets aside penalty imposed under Section 129(1)(b), directing authorities to apply Section 129(1)(a) where goods were accompanied by tax invoice.
Rajasthan High Court held that rejection of tender bid due to non-filing of GSTR-3B return constitutes material deviation since filing of GSTR-3B is mandatory tender condition. Accordingly, writ petition dismissed.
The High Court granted bail to an applicant who had absconded for 14 years, noting his clean record, prior compliance, and undertaking to cooperate in trial proceedings.
The High Court held that a six-month delay in filing a statutory revision under the Customs Act cannot be condoned. The Court found no justification for the delay and refused to exercise writ jurisdiction.
he Court held that the challenged letter was only a preliminary query, not a show cause notice. The petitioner must reply, after which authorities may close the matter or issue a formal notice with proper legal provisions.
