What is the classification for the services received by M/ s Robo Quarries Private Limited from the state of Karnataka for which Royalty is being paid by M/s Robo Quarries Private Limited? Whether the said service can be classified under the heading 9973 specifically under 997337 as licensing services for the right to use minerals including its exploration and evaluation or any other service under notification No 11/2017 -Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 ?
In re Indian Institute of Management, Bengaluru (GST AAAR Karnataka) a) Pursuant to the enactment of the IIM Act, 2017, with effect from 31st January 2018, the long duration post graduate programs offered by IIMB will be exempt from GST under SI.No 66 of the Notification No 12/2017 CT(R) as amended. During the period 31st […]
In re M/s. Nash Industries (I) Pvt. Ltd (GST AAAR Karnataka) The appallate authority for advance ruling has set aside the rulings passed under section 98(4) of the CGST Act 2017 vide NO. KAR ADRG 24/2018 dated 25/10/2018 i.e. Contention of the appellant is allowed based on examination of the contract and purchase orders furnished. […]
Whether the ‘Power Bank’, traded by the Applicant, is classifiable under Heading 8504 40 90 as ‘Static Converter – Others’? The ‘Power Bank’, traded by the Applicant, is classifiable under Heading 8507 as Accumulator and not as Static Converter.
In re M/s. Toshniwal Brothers (SR) Private Limited (GST AAAR Karnataka) In the instant case there is no dispute that the Agency contract in question involves two taxable supplies of services i.e promotion and marketing service and after-sales support service. However in order for the supply to be termed as a ‘composite supply’, what is required […]
The product Evacuated Tube Collector (ETC) though falls under Chapter 84 heading 19 but is not covered under SL.No.234 of Schedule-I of the Notification 01/2017-Integrated Tax(Rate) dated 28.06.2017, effective from 01.07.2017, & hence not entitled for concessional rate of 5% IGST.
The India Management Office (IMO) of the Appellant is providing a service to its other distinct units by way of carrying out activities such as accounting, administrative work, etc with the use of the services of the employees working in the IMO, the outcome of which benefits all the other units and such activity is to be treated as a taxable supply in terms of the entry 2 of Schedule I read with Section 7 of the CGST Act.
In re OPTA Cabs Private Limited (GST AAAR Karnataka) The appellate authority for advance ruling upheld the rulings passed under section 98(4) of the GST Act 2017 vide NO. KAR ADRG 14/2018 dated 27/07/2018 ie the services of transportation of passengers supplied through the Appellant’s electronic platform and digital network would be liable to tax […]
In re Bindu Ventures (GST AAR Karnataka) (a) Which date should be considered as the date of completion of the property – the date of receipt of necessary approvals from BBMP / Karnataka Pollution Control Board / Karnataka Electricity Board or the date of receipt of completion certificate from a registered Chartered Engineer? The date […]
In re M/s C M Enviro Systems Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) Applicant has sought for Advance Ruling on the question that Can our product be classified as Scientific ek Technical Instruments, Equipments under a relevant Chapter Headingt. But the Applicant requested to permit them to withdraw the application filed for advance ruling vide their […]
