Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Delhi International Cargo Terminal Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2023-24
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Delhi International Cargo Terminal Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Mumbai ITAT: Typographical Error in Tax Audit Report Cannot Deny PF Deduction if Contribution Was Actually Paid Within Due Date The Mumbai ITAT held that a mere typographical error in the Tax Audit Report cannot justify disallowance of employees’ Provident Fund (PF) contribution under section 36(1)(va) where the evidence establishes that the contribution was in fact deposited within the statutory due date. In this case, the tax auditor mistakenly reported the date of deposit as 11.01.2022 instead of the correct date 05.01...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 80P(2)(d) Deduction Allowed on Interest from Co-operative Bank Deposits: ITAT Pune Section 154 Rectification Rejected as Wrong Deductor Details Required Verification: ITAT Pune Gratuity Trust Contribution and Export Commission Allowed After Subsequent Trust Approval: ITAT Mumbai Section 270A Penalty Deleted as Bombay HC Quashed Section 148 Reassessment Notice: ITAT Mumbai Section 69A Addition Deleted as AO Relied Only on Investigation Report: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031