In re Ms Hotel Leela Venture Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) i) Whether Sale of Karnataka Hotel as going concern on slump sale basis can be construed to be “Supply” in terms of Section 7(1) of the CGST Act 2017? If answered in affirmative, whether the transaction would be regarded as supply of goods or supply […]
In re M/s Sanika Developers (GST AAR Karnataka) The activity of construction of complex or building intended for sale to a buyer wholely or partly, where the entire consideration has been received /receivable after completion of construction, be treated as supply of taxable service ? But the Applicant requested to permit them to withdraw the […]
In re M/s. Rashi Eco Tourism Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) The Applicant, vide their letter dated 09.03.2019, received in this office on 13.03.2019, has requested to permit them to withdraw the application filed for advance ruling, consequent to the decision of the Board of Directors of the Applicant Company. In view of the above, we […]
In re M/s Britannia Industries Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether the promotional product would qualify to be a supply liable to GST and whether the supply of the main product with free product would fall within the mischief of a mixed supply attracting the rate of tax of the product attracting the highest rate of […]
In re M/s Triveni Turbine Limited (GST AAAR Karnataka) The appallate authority for advance ruling has set aside the rulings passed under section 98(4) of the CGST Act 2017 vide NO.KAR.ADRG 28/2018 dated 17/11/2018 i.e. Contention of the appeallant is allowed based on the Circular No 80/54/2018-GST dated 31.12.2018, at Para 11, has clarified that […]
In re M/s NMDC Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether credit of service tax paid on Operation & Maintainenance service received by the applicant in Pre-GST regime can be claimed as Input Tax credit under section 140(5) of the GST Act 2017 in case invoices for such services were received after the appointed date. But the […]
The Applicant Company is engaged in manufacturing and supply of sand and a range of construction materials. They obtained mining rights from the Government of Karnataka for quarrying minerals from the mines located at different locations within the state of Karnataka.
What is the classification for the services received by M/ s Robo Quarries Private Limited from the state of Karnataka for which Royalty is being paid by M/s Robo Quarries Private Limited? Whether the said service can be classified under the heading 9973 specifically under 997337 as licensing services for the right to use minerals including its exploration and evaluation or any other service under notification No 11/2017 -Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 ?
In re Indian Institute of Management, Bengaluru (GST AAAR Karnataka) a) Pursuant to the enactment of the IIM Act, 2017, with effect from 31st January 2018, the long duration post graduate programs offered by IIMB will be exempt from GST under SI.No 66 of the Notification No 12/2017 CT(R) as amended. During the period 31st […]
In re M/s. Nash Industries (I) Pvt. Ltd (GST AAAR Karnataka) The appallate authority for advance ruling has set aside the rulings passed under section 98(4) of the CGST Act 2017 vide NO. KAR ADRG 24/2018 dated 25/10/2018 i.e. Contention of the appellant is allowed based on examination of the contract and purchase orders furnished. […]
