Read all latest corporate law news, articles, notifications & circular on Taxguru.in. News on laws related to DIPP Labour Minimum Wages Gratuity PF Arbitration Negotiable instrument Essential Commodities SRFAESI Competition Act Corporate Law
Corporate Law : Explore 45 FAQs on EDs search, investigation, seizure, and arrest processes, including recent proceedings against high-profile fig...
Corporate Law : MP HC urges immediate implementation of Uniform Civil Code in X vs State of Madhya Pradesh, stressing its necessity beyond mere le...
Corporate Law : Learn the process to change the name of a trademark applicant or user on the Trademark India portal. Follow our detailed guide for...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC rules mere association with Dawood Ibrahim doesn't qualify as terror gang membership under UAPA. Key insights from Parve...
Corporate Law : Discover how institutional investor rules affect local corporate governance in India, the USA, and the UK, and their overall impac...
Corporate Law : Discover the 'Vatsalya' pension scheme for minors launched by the Ministry of Finance. Learn about contributions, conversion optio...
Corporate Law : Union Budget 2024 introduces eight new MSME support measures, including credit schemes, enhanced Mudra loans, and new SIDBI branch...
Corporate Law : New centrally sponsored scheme announced: 20 lakh youth to be skilled, 1,000 ITIs upgraded, and skill loan limits increased to ₹...
Corporate Law : Govt launches 3 employment schemes: wage support for new workers, incentives for manufacturing jobs, and employer support to boost...
Corporate Law : Finance Ministry's new capital gains tax: Short-term gains at 20%, long-term at 12.5%. Exemption limit raised to ₹1.25 lakh for ...
Corporate Law : Explore the Competition Commission of India’s decision in Anil Bansal vs. Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited, focusing on allega...
Corporate Law : Competition Commission of India dismissed allegations against sugar mills and associations for bid-rigging and price-fixing in the...
Corporate Law : Saint Gobain India Pvt. Ltd. faces allegations of anti-competitive practices under the Competition Act, 2002, involving exclusive ...
Corporate Law : Read the full text of the Bombay High Court judgment ordering Rs. 10 lakh compensation for harassment of a Chinese woman by Custom...
Corporate Law : NCLAT Delhi ruled that financial creditors who are allottees under RERA must meet the threshold criteria to file a Section 7 appli...
Corporate Law : Latest updates to the Prevention of Money-laundering Rules, 2024, focusing on KYC processes, client verification, and record maint...
Corporate Law : Explore IRDAI's final order on Aegon Life Insurance (now Bandhan Life) regarding violations of AML and policyholder protection reg...
Corporate Law : Explore India Post's new operational guidelines for bulk customers of registered articles, including eligibility, registration pro...
Corporate Law : MHA issues guidelines to ensure nondiscriminatory prison visitation rights for LGBTQ+ community, emphasizing equal treatment in al...
Corporate Law : Participate in the public consultation on amending Rule 3 of the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011. Deadline: 29....
Having considered the submissions made on behalf of the Appellant and the Respondent appearing in-person, we are of the view that the judgment and order of the High Court does not require any interference, particularly when the issue raised in this Appeal has already been decided by this Court in Civil Appeal No.1932 of 1982, wherein it was categorically held that the Coal Mines Provident Fund Commissioner is a public servant
NOTIFICATION F.No.3-1/Amend/Comb. Regl./2012/CD/CCI, dated 23-2-2012 These regulations may be called the Competition Commission of India (Procedure in regard to the transaction of business relating to combinations) Amendment Regulations, 2012. (2) They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
A.K. Balaji Vs. GOI (Madras High Court)- This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to take appropriate action against respondents or any other Foreign Law Firm or Foreign Lawyers, who are illegally practising the Profession of Law in India, and for a further direction to forbear them from having any legal practice either on the litigation side or in the field of non-litigation and commercial transactions, in any manner whatsoever within the territory of India.
There is an urgent need to move from government regulation to self regulation. This was stated by Union Minister for Corporate Affairs Dr. M. Veerappa Moily while delivering valedictory address at the 8th Corporate Registers Forum (CRF) 2012 here today. He stressed on setting of norms and standards which attract the international firms and setting of standard norms that help to improve good governance.
As per the extant ECB procedures, requests for reduction in the amount of ECB, changes in the drawdown schedule and reduction in the all-in-cost of the ECB after obtaining the loan registration number (LRN) is required to be referred by the bank concerned to the RBI for necessary approval. Simplifying norms for overseas borrowers, the RBI today said they will no longer require its approval to raise an amount lesser than sanctioned ECB as the power to authorize the same has been delegated to banks.
A.V. Padma & Ors. Vs. R. Venugopal & Ors. (SC)- In motor vehicles accident compensation claims, the entire amount may be disbursed to the claimant if he or she is literate. It is not necessary to deposit it in a bank for the safety of the dependents as some tribunals do.
JIK Industries Limited & Ors. Vs. Amarlal V. Jumani (Supreme Court)- It was held that cases of bounced cheque are independent of the revival bid of a sick company. Proceedings in bounced cheque cases under the Negotiable Instruments Act will continue even if there is a scheme to revive the sick company. The revival attempt under the Companies Act will not affect prosecution of charges under Section 138 of the Act. The charges cannot be compounded as in other cases under the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC).
The Quality Review Board has been reconstituted by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.
B. Chandramathi Vs. N. Prakash (SC)- Appellant is about 51 years of age. She is a poor widow who is eking out a living for herself and her family by making jowar rotis and selling them. She is the only earning member of her family. She has two children to look after. It appears that the appellant is unwell. She is stated to have suffered from depression. As of today, the appellant has undergone the sentence for a period of about 2 months before she was released on bail.
In the 1st week of October, 2009, the petitioner came to know that the respondents have infringed its trademark by using the word ‘Arnimax’ on its products coupled with the trade dress and thereby has infringed the registered trademark and passed off its products as that of the petitioner. Accordingly, C.S. 360 of 2009 was filed and an interim order passed on 19th February, 2010 restraining the respondent from dealing with, offering for sale, advertising, marketing or publicising the impugned trademark ‘Arnimax’. Such order was continued on 8th April, 2010 and direction given for filing affidavits. An affidavit has been filed and a No Objection Certificate dated 9th December, 2002 has been relied upon by the respondent. Such No Objection Certificate was given by one Das Homoeo Laboratory (P) Ltd. No certificate of the petitioner has been produced. In fact on a comparison of the signature of the person who is the signatory to the certificate with the signature in the Indenture of Lease dated 25th March, 1988 the said signature will not tally. The licence given to Das Homoeo Laboratory (P) Ltd. by the owners of the registered trademark did not include the registered trademark ‘Arnimax’. Therefore, neither Das Homoeo Laboratory (P) Ltd. nor anyone deriving a right thereunder could have issued the No Objection Certificate. No document evidencing sale, registration or user has been produced by the respondent therefore the case of infringement made out subsists and the order dated 19th February, 2010 and subsequent orders passed be confirmed.
